Roulett Game For Phones

22 Febbraio 2007

Clima ideologico.


Impera il Pensiero Unico. Un giorno sì e l'altro pure da giornali, telegiornali e programmi di ambientalismo veniamo terrorizzati con l'incombente cambiamento climatico, che minaccia la Terra.
La responsabilità di questo “global warming”, di questo riscaldamento globale, ci dicono i mass media, è dei gas serra, che sono immessi nell'aria dalle attività of human power, transport, industry, etc. .. We are with our cars, dishwashers, air conditioners to cause, directly and indirectly, to pollution of the atmosphere and the consequent increase in the greenhouse. Over all, the Amerikan, the lords of consumerism, which are held up to public ridicule.
In 1997, he signed the Kyoto Protocol by which States undertake to reduce the percentage variations, state by state, the greenhouse gas emissions compared to 1990 levels by 2010. For example, Italy is committed to an 8%, like other European countries, such emissions.
The Kyoto Protocol lists among greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrates fluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, sulfur hexafluoride.
It seems that the future of life on our planet depends on the implementation of the Kyoto Protocol by all States and, especially, by the most industrialized, or apocalyptic scenarios are envisaged.
It seems, from how we tell it, that this is all scientists agree. Seems.
If we do, however, a little research on the internet we find that:
to . among the greenhouse gases, by far the most important (ie, affects about 75% -95%) for the heating effect is water vapor (in the form of gas or clouds) of not known, yet the dynamics;
b . against a steady increase in the concentrations of CO ² (carbon dioxide) during the 20th century, the average global temperature has increased, strangely, intermittently and not, as logic would dictate, just as constant in the period from 1940 to 1975, there was even un'abbassamento average global temperature, causing a series of alarmist articles by scientists, who saw the beginnings of a new ice age;
the Earth's climate has always been subject to natural variation: there have archaeological evidence of cultivation of grapevines in Roman Britain, while in 1600 and 1700 the Thames was regularly frozen in winter, without of course speak of the many ice ages and subsequent "global warming" occurring before the appearance of man on our planet;
c . scientists are very divided about the causes of "global warming", since the climate a new science complex and controversial
d . Many scientists believe the marginal effect of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases on climate change on Earth and instead attribute the main cause of the periodic variation of the radiation of the sun (in fact it was found that in recent years has increased, , the surface temperature the other planets of the Solar System!)
and . even if all States join the Kyoto Protocol and the guidelines of center, the impact on "global warming" would, according to the scientists, is negligible, as the cost of such a program would be high and unloaded on the public, with an increase in the cost of energy, particularly high in Italy already for our decision to drop the nuclear surface.

The guru of Tony Blair, Lord Giddens said some time ago "to control the risk, you must scare people." Well. We are succeeding. With what purpose? A scientist
climatologist, on the subject, said we need to ask three questions: 1
. The climate is changing? 2. Why? 3. What should we do?
Here are his answers.
The first question can be answered that yes, the beginning of the 20th century, the temperature is increased, but we do not know if it continues to grow or if we are unstoppable in front of a climatic fluctuations, including short-term, as we have seen, ever occurred on Earth.
The second question we have to honestly say that we do not know. We can only speculate.
the third question we must answer, semplicemente, essere pronti ad adeguarci ai possibili ed inarrestabili cambiamenti climatici che, comunque, saranno lenti e graduali, e a fronte dei quali, e solo se necessario, saranno approntati gli interventi più opportuni.

Se poi vogliamo diminuire il consumismo ed in particolare quello relativo al petrolio, al carbone e al gas, siamo tutti d'accordo! Però per altri motivi.... e ce ne sono! Da quelli economici a quelli ambientali. Ma non prendiamo la scusa del cambiamento climatico!

Nel pubblico dibattito non c'è spazio, però, per chi non si allinea con la verità ufficiale! La Royal Society inglese ha addirittura tried to prevent the financing of the research of climate scientists, who do not share its alarmist views on climate. The scientists, who disagree with the official truth, can not help but take refuge on the internet, the only place where they explain, on private sites, their ideas. But public opinion, we know, are the newspapers and, especially, television, who has access to these media and who is riding this emergency for political reasons (among them, Al Gore).
It's called "public" but is an opinion on which of us, "the public" we have no influence: there are the already beautiful and packed.